News:
CAA Meeting Update: FPV exemption extended to 3.5kg AUW and 1000ft Max Altitude from March 2014
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Fpv-Forum.com
»
Equipment
»
Video Equipment
»
#11 vs #16 comparison
User Info
Username:
Password:
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
Recent Posts/Topics
Damped Light ESC and Programming
by
bigMouse
[
Today
at 09:22:18 AM]
FPV Related 3D Prints
by
bigMouse
[
Today
at 09:20:59 AM]
Bank Holiday Monday FPV
by
bigMouse
[
Today
at 08:46:34 AM]
a wing and a prayer
by
bigMouse
[May 05, 2015, 08:39:55 AM]
Gens Ace Lipo Battery
by
bigMouse
[May 04, 2015, 10:42:19 PM]
MrBen's Spanky 6 Quadcopter Ultimate Beast Build Thread
by
bigMouse
[May 04, 2015, 10:19:36 PM]
MDC Our digs for your pleasure :)
by
bigMouse
[May 04, 2015, 08:08:26 PM]
anyone flying the weekend?
by
Dan
[May 04, 2015, 07:42:23 PM]
Chasing mr.ben
by
bigMouse
[May 04, 2015, 04:40:29 PM]
Setting up a mix on taranis **HELP**
by
MrBen
[May 03, 2015, 09:12:39 PM]
Help :) :-)
by
bigMouse
[May 03, 2015, 10:03:21 AM]
Micro Minim OSD (MWOSD for Naze)
by
bigMouse
[May 03, 2015, 09:57:02 AM]
x5 maiden
by
xxpitt
[May 03, 2015, 09:48:59 AM]
well ive finally gone and done it
by
mark1975
[May 02, 2015, 07:43:10 PM]
What did the postman bring you today?
by
MrBen
[May 02, 2015, 06:19:07 PM]
Traders Section
New 250 FPV Racer
by
JUST CRASH
[May 04, 2015, 09:36:43 AM]
« previous
next »
Print
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Author
Topic: #11 vs #16 comparison (Read 2147 times)
Cupid Stunt
Guest
Re: #11 vs #16 comparison
«
Reply #15 on:
July 04, 2013, 05:29:18 PM »
Yes you're right
I do see that you have yours on "Darker" for exposure though
In the video it just didn't seem to be adjusting for differing light levels at all
Logged
Dusty
Legendary Member
Posts: 3344
Re: #11 vs #16 comparison
«
Reply #16 on:
July 04, 2013, 05:34:07 PM »
your exposure is on "Darker", try "Normal"
Logged
bigMouse
Ultimate Member
Posts: 1863
Re: #11 vs #16 comparison
«
Reply #17 on:
July 04, 2013, 06:32:48 PM »
Thing is , is that on a sunny day you can't fault the results. And carrying a laptop around to adjust levels according to the weather isn't practical. Just uploading a bit of video taken in poor light, it's virtually unusable, but illustrates the bad metering on it, Not complaining, don't think the gopro would be much better under these conditions.
Evening light, low cloud, rain threatening, only light source the horizon, cam can't compensate, fov so huge that the horizon light is nearly always in view. When it's not then the video gets reasonable and the colours get better.
Evening rain
Logged
Dusty
Legendary Member
Posts: 3344
Re: #11 vs #16 comparison
«
Reply #18 on:
July 04, 2013, 06:59:30 PM »
here's the #16 on "normal" on a dull day here
Funjet Ultra - LOS - #16 HD Keychain
Logged
Cupid Stunt
Guest
Re: #11 vs #16 comparison
«
Reply #19 on:
July 04, 2013, 10:31:42 PM »
bigMouse, the #16 is much better than if you set it to Normal instead of Darker
Logged
bigMouse
Ultimate Member
Posts: 1863
Re: #11 vs #16 comparison
«
Reply #20 on:
July 04, 2013, 11:12:17 PM »
ok will try it!
Logged
ianholt1
Full Member
Posts: 82
Re: #11 vs #16 comparison
«
Reply #21 on:
July 20, 2013, 07:32:28 PM »
I have the #16 808 with the 120deg lens and I find the video recording to be superb but I am also using the video out facility for FPV and the live video is nowhere near as good as the recorded footage! When I play back the video it is great, anybody else found this? I am using Fatshark goggles on 5.8ghz.
Thanks, Ian
Logged
bigMouse
Ultimate Member
Posts: 1863
Re: #11 vs #16 comparison
«
Reply #22 on:
July 20, 2013, 08:00:02 PM »
Record and playback video is at 720p HD. The video out facility is half hd quality (and even if it was better it would get reduced to 640 X 480 at the fatsharks.
No way around it I'm afraid! You can improve the video your using for flying by using a separate flight cam, I did a test and even the 1 gram micro cam had much clearer output than the #16 video out.
Best would be the pixim seawolf but that is bigger and heavier, there are several choices in between though.
Logged
Print
Pages:
1
[
2
]
« previous
next »
Fpv-Forum.com
»
Equipment
»
Video Equipment
»
#11 vs #16 comparison
Who's Online
Guests: 24
Hidden: 0
Users: 4
Users Online
:
bigMouse
Jake Bullit
Kwygladala
papa_lazerous
Classified Ads
No posts were found.
Recent Images
No attachments were found.